Challenger 2 "Megatron"

keep pace

Applied to many complex systems used by modern military, the level of "decrease in qualification" is of great importance. It directly affects the success or failure of the squadron while maintaining their tanks in good condition, not least because mechanics and locksmiths must know what and where to look for in order to maintain the combat readiness of vehicles, and for each vehicle everything is purely individual each time. Periodic trips and exercises also contribute to the improvement of the crew's skills in maintenance and troubleshooting and, as a result, the technical readiness of the vehicle.

The instillation and development of skills has an impact on both safety and the levels of joint combat training that can be achieved. Understanding how to work inside or outside of an armored vehicle not only minimizes the chance of getting into an accident or even a deadly situation during training or combat, but also means that there is less time spent on costly exercises (like those conducted in Canada). should be given to re-learning the basics and accordingly to maximize the benefits of combat training high level.

In this regard, Tank Squadron "C" has become "lucky", since, since 2013, it has taken part in several exercises. Thus, its personnel were able to maximize the level of their combat readiness for participation in major event- bilateral maneuvers at the British BATUS training ground in Canada, held in September-October 2014 and which became the culmination of the "School Year". The 12th Brigade was also able to show good results, since the two mechanized infantry battalions assigned to it had already received the Warrior BMP and therefore successfully cleared their individual obstacle courses; on the contrary, it turned out that some of the crews of the “mock enemy” got into these vehicles for the first time.

The first test of the squadron's readiness for deployment took place in October-December 2014, when it was deployed in southeastern Poland as part of the Black Eagle exercise as part of the 1,300-man LABG lead armored combat group, which deployed 350 vehicles, including 100 armored. The exercise was announced in July 2014, giving the squadron more time to prepare than might have been expected. Most of the tanks were removed from long-term storage warehouses in the German town of Mönchengladbach, where they were stored to provide for the 20th brigade. (The remaining tanks were supplied from the presence of active tank units and from the UK were delivered by sea and by railway). It must be said that in the process of preparing for the exercises, difficulties arose regarding ensuring the full technical readiness of each tank on time.

The next important step in the readiness process for the 12th Brigade was the three-week Tractable exercise, first held at Salisbury Plain in March 2015. This was the first deployment of the brigade's new and expanded Lead Armored Task Force (LATF), which, together with LABG, should be ready to move out within 30 days of receiving the order. The size of the operational group, in which the LABG was combined with the reconnaissance combat group, combat support units (engineers, cannon and rocket artillery, air defense) and the logistic support combat group (medical service, logistics) amounted to 1650 people and 570 Vehicle.

This exercise enabled some LATF units to obtain vehicles from long-term storage at Ashchurch (the KRH Tank Regiment used its vehicles), and these, along with other armored vehicles of the task force, including several vehicles from support units, usually based in the north of England, were transported by rail. road and sea at Salisbury Plain. The units of the operational group received practical skills in loading onto transport aircraft and landing craft, after which a simulation of the performance of defensive and offensive tasks was carried out.

Although Tractable 2015 is a larger event than other recent exercises, it was seen as just another step in the process of restoring brigade-level combat capability. Speaking about the prospects for Tractable 2016 (which will coincide with the year the 1st Brigade came on alert), 3rd (British) Division Commander Maj. Gen. James Cowan said that "there is hope to deploy a full brigade next year." It is clear that there is also an intention to conduct divisional deployment exercises before the end of the decade. The last such British Army force projection exercise was Saif Sareea II, held in Oman in September-October 2001. Later, they were highly appreciated, as they made a significant contribution to the rapid organization and success of Operation Telic 1 in 2003.

New ways of war

While units of newly formed mechanized infantry brigades are rushing to “relearn” professional skills that their Cold War predecessors at the lowest tactical echelons might have described as familiar, a number of technical and organizational innovations have had a significant impact on how platoons and squadrons in tank regiments could fight on a modern hybrid battlefield. Here, first of all, it is worth noting the growing importance of the integration of air and ground platforms, the capabilities of regular surveillance systems, intelligence gathering information and target designation, as well as the digitization process.

The potential benefits of these capabilities were very clear in Iraq (especially for the British), as well as in the "dense" operational space of Afghanistan. The point is that in today's increasingly complex combat environment it is necessary to push these capabilities forward, they must make their positive contribution to maintaining or expanding the combat strength of an armored unit without negatively affecting its high-speed maneuver operations.

The 12th Brigade was the first to switch in 2004-2005 to Bowman digital radios, although it was only in the last two years that its tank regiment began to fully use the full potential of these tactical communications. The Bowman networks of the KRH tank regiment (King's Royal Hussars) are currently operating on latest version BCIP (Bowman Combat Information and Platform) 5.5 software and in addition to two conventional Bowman VHF UK/VRC358/9 radios (with a total bandwidth of 16 kbps), command tanks are currently equipped with a UK/VRC340 HCDR high bandwidth radio, although and due to the removal of four armor-piercing high-explosive ammunition from the ammunition rack in the aft niche of the tower. In principle, a fourth duplex radio station, such as the UK / VRC329 HF, can be placed in the Challenger 2 tank, although such improvisation is not common.

In mobile applications, the Bowman HCDR high bandwidth radio operating in the UHF band (225-450 MHz) currently has a total data rate of about 0.3 Mbps (users would like more) and a practical range between nodes of about 5 km. The continuous range is extended by networking nodes, each squadron has two command tanks (this allows the squadron to be divided into two parts), communicating with a dedicated data network, which is a single network for the battle group. Other HCDR radios assigned to the squadron are installed on Panther reconnaissance vehicles, Combat Vehicle Reconnaissance (Tracked) (CVR[T]) tracked reconnaissance vehicles or mobile workshops and are automatically networked, providing required connection with remote subscribers.

One of the officers from the KRH Panzer Regiment said that "we are developing and achieving success in the battle group, making the digital kit work." Bowman systems may not yet be as intuitive as soldiers would like, but at the same time, "we increase our capabilities with them." In order to avoid the deterioration of skills and professionalism, there is a constant need for "individual training in Bowman systems" while personnel are in the barracks. But, at the same time, the KRH regiment took part in a large number of military exercises, which helped the soldiers maintain their communication skills at the required level.

Today, Challenger 2 units are controlled primarily using formatted data and voice messages; voice traffic is provided by the mandatory Bowman Chat unencrypted messaging system. Referring to the US Army's experience with its FBCB2 (Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below) combat management system, the officer noted that some of the formatted messages built into the PBISA (Platform The Battlefield Information System Application, which runs on the Challenger 2 and Warrior's Bowman BMS hardware, is "rather clanking" and is typically used to transmit extended situation reports or repeat messages. The PBISA software, however, is flexible enough to be used to transmit emergency fire calls or targeting data messages within a platoon or to the upper levels of a squadron or battle group.

Using Bowman's original APLNR (Automatic Position Location Navigation and Reporting) mode, each tank's position coordinates received from an advanced military DAGR GPS receiver connected to a VHF radio are automatically sent to other subscribers at preset intervals, as usually every five minutes or when moving 250 meters. The “near real time” solution helps maintain a high level of situational awareness, although APLNR voice messages automatically take precedence over data, which usually results in a decrease in situational awareness exactly at the moment when it is most needed - in the middle of “contact”.

In order to avoid conflicts of this kind, it was invented (as part of the upcoming modernization existing systems Bowman Legacy System Upgrade) solution in the form of OSPR (Own-Station Position Reporting) software patch, which allowed each voice message on the network to be automatically “tagged” with the subscriber’s coordinates (provided that his radio station has a GPS unit ). A third means of maintaining situational awareness is to combine APLNR and OSPR data into consolidated position reports that are periodically "pushed" into the battlegroup level network and then returned with complete situational data around the battlegroup. It is understood, however, that consolidated position reports are generally not used as they are largely obsolete by the time they are actually combined into one report.

In the event of injury, equipment failure, or a change in combat plans, individual subscribers can change platforms, and completed units or battle groups immediately change their networks. This is called cross-platform or in the terms of the American army "reorganization on the fly"; the KRH regiment also announces a gradual transition to such networking.

If one of the tanks is hit, Bowman's upgraded software allows its commander to switch to another tank, taking with him the commander's bag (maps, GPS device, list of orders and reports) and re-engage with his call sign. However, all this provided that he has access to a cryptographic key input device, with which he must reprogram the radio station of a new tank in about 20 minutes in accordance with regimental instructions. However, in case of failure, he can also bring his own radio station.

The rapid change of network ownership on a large scale depends on a well-thought-out communication scheme that provides for "software inserts" in the form of a regrouping of voice and data networks. If a specific regrouping is not in the communication scheme and a new network needs to be established, this can be done in the field at the battlegroup level in 45 minutes. However, it may take a few days for the new communication scheme to be rolled out to the entire brigade.

Joint firing and the ISTAR interface

The main change, which is a consequence of the Afghan experience, is to give each unit the company level of the FST (fire support team). The FST consists of forward artillery observers, MFC (mortar fire controller) mortar spotters and an FAC (forward air controller) forward air guidance post officer; with the advent of the latter in the tank squadron, a professional communication channel with the "third dimension" appeared for the first time. A mechanized infantry battle group can have five FSTs: one with a reconnaissance platoon, one with a tank squadron, one with each mechanized infantry company on a Warrior BMP, and a fifth with a mechanized infantry company on Mastiff MPV armored vehicles. In the case of 'C' Squadron, its seven-man FST team uses an artillery observation vehicle based on a Warrior chassis and a Spartan light tracked vehicle, which is typically provided to MFC spotters.

One of the squadron officers explained that “we must think smarter, as there are fewer tanks, and the degree of technological superiority between us and possible opponents is reduced. There is no point in playing by the rules and getting close to the enemy if you don't want to."

The sight of a "burning tank" (including the allies) today has a huge impact on public opinion, since the television picture owns the mood of the masses. Therefore, in a peacekeeping operation, it may be more appropriate in certain circumstances to use tanks in combination with ISTAR (information gathering, observation, target designation and reconnaissance) and joint fire, while using the maneuverability of the tank and the psychological effect in order to force the enemy start moving, as a result of which other platforms can open fire on it with minimal risk.

Thus, when targets are detected that the tanks themselves cannot cope with, the commanders immediately contact the FST with a request for close air support or open fire with the necessary impact on these targets. If the FST does not see the target directly, the tank commander will be able to correct the fire himself, applying his experience gained in preparing for interaction and adjusting artillery fire. He must also be familiar with the entire fighter close air support emergency call sequence and the standardized procedures used to call attack helicopters.

Another consequence of the Afghan experience is the adoption of an unmanned combat group aircraft(UAV) with ISTAR type of reconnaissance and information collection tools based on the Desert Hawk 3. These drones are equipped with optical-electronic reconnaissance stations with a color video camera and a thermal imager, images from which can be transmitted to the squadron or battle group headquarters or directly to the FST fire support group . The battle group can also count on the command of two Watchkeeper UAVs from the brigade, which, for example, can work on the flanks and complement other reconnaissance assets of the battle group.

An intelligence officer from the KRH observed that it was important, however, to get rid of the Afghan “kill TV” mentality, where commanders become too obsessed with what they see on drone video. “An armored battle group almost always operates at a good pace,” he continued, “and if there is an overdependence on technical means ISTAR, then there is a danger of reducing the number of those people who are simply present in the combat zone. At the same time, he suggested that a dry voice report from a pilot or UAV operator could be as useful to the intelligence department of a battle group as a live video image. The work of the intelligence department is to provide units with timely samples from general information derived from the ISTAR assets available in the battle group, whether they are on the ground, in the air or even in space.

He went on to expand on the topic of intelligence, saying that “we take into account and creatively rework the experience of Afghanistan and Iraq, for example, by expanding the range of various reconnaissance assets available to the battle group, but at the same time we do not shun the experience of military operations of the last century. We are working on integrating these tools and on the cognitive load they have on vehicle crews.”

Part of the solution lies in the continuous tactical training of command and staff units CSTTX (command staff tactical exercise), which is carried out at the Ground Warfare Center. The CSTTX training courses themselves, divided into the combined arms tactical training (CAST) and the command and staff training (CATT) stages and conducted in last years Operation Herrick (2010-2014) were originally organized to assist company and battalion-level headquarters deployed in Afghanistan to integrate networked sensor systems and conventional weapons systems with fixed roadblocks and forward operating bases, as well as best use reconnaissance brigade. It is unlikely that an armored squadron today will have the same level of reconnaissance or reconnaissance assets, especially during maneuvers, but the appearance of the promising Scout vehicle will certainly expand the capabilities of the battle group in terms of information gathering, reconnaissance and surveillance beyond what can be currently provide the scimitar armored reconnaissance vehicle.

Preparing for the exercise

The change in tactical methods of conducting combat operations of the battle group also resulted in the creation in Canada of the BATUS Combat Training Center with a 2960 km2 training ground, where the combined arms exercises of the British Army Medicine Man were held in 1972. In the 2000s, the BATUS Center could host up to six 30-day rotations of armored and mechanized infantry units per year (including 10 days of live firing and 12 days of two-pronged exercises), two of which could be brigade level (CT5) and four combat levels. group (CT4), although the schedule (as always) depended on the state of affairs in the "real world".

Since 2010, the role of the BATUS center has changed; general training for reconnaissance, light infantry and motorized infantry units that make up mixed combat groups, which are then sent for special combat training (associated with the peacekeeping operation in Afghanistan). However, BATUS can still prepare battle groups for expeditionary operations for other theaters (not just for Afghanistan). In 2013, a new series of exercises was launched under the general name "Prairie Storm" (Storm in the steppe). They are aimed at preparing for hybrid combat operations of motorized infantry and armored combat groups; there are only four rotations per year, but at the same time, the duration of each rotation has increased to five weeks.

Remarkably, all battlegroups arriving for the Prairie Storm exercises use armored and non-armored vehicles from the BATUS Center reserve. Also in the center there is a fleet of armored vehicles with a visually modified appearance, which are involved in exercises on the side of the mock enemy and on which laser systems for "firing" targets are installed. (Many years of successful work in the maintenance and operation of reserve vehicles at the BATUS Center was one of the reasons for the decision by the British Ministry of Defense to launch a fleet management program for the rest of the registered vehicles.)

In recent years, another innovation at the BATUS Center has been the coordinated participation of fighters and attack helicopters (or aircraft imitating them) in a series of exercises with real close air support, as well as the introduction of a laser system that simulates firing at targets, which made it possible to implement the participation of ground-based components Air defense (in the form of a mobile air defense system based on the Stormer vehicle) and indirect fire systems. In connection with the end of Operation Herrick, it also became possible to send Lynx AH.9A helicopters equipped with MX-10 optoelectronic stations with real-time video transmission channels to the British Center in Canada. This will allow training for hybrid warfare, an integral part of which is elevated level possession of the situation large areas or in urban areas. These helicopters will eventually be retired and replaced by Wildcat AH helicopters. 1, equipped with a similar optoelectronic station, but which currently do not have a video data transmission channel for ground forces.

Tank prospects

Today, the most visible expression of the firepower and protection of the Challenger 2 tank is its TES (Theatre Entry Standard) variant, developed for the late stages of Operation Telic in Iraq. The ATDU (Armament Trials and Development Unit) Weapons Systems Development and Test Center in Bovington holds reference TES configuration models for all armored and non-armored vehicles operated by reconnaissance and tank regiments of the British Army.

The Challenger 2 TES variant makes up a small part of the British tank fleet; a total of 27 machines were upgraded to this standard. The development of the standard began in connection with urgent operational needs, which were the result of experience gained in conducting peacekeeping and urban operations, as well as the combat training of a tank squadron deployed in Basra in 2007-2009. In accordance with the new standard, additional all-aspect protection against cumulative projectiles and improvised explosive devices (IEDs), including directional land mines, was installed. The passive armor kit is supplemented with active electronic jamming and visibility control equipment (signatures). In order to minimize the heating of electronic equipment in the sun and improve the working conditions of the crew on the front plate, upper and side surfaces The tank was equipped with CoolCam panels from Saab Barracuda.

Other innovations include the installation of a thermal imager in the place of the driver, a rear-view camera and a telephone to communicate with the infantry. Firepower was also increased by installing a charging remote controlled combat module (DBM) Enforcer manufactured by Selex and Rafael in front of the hatch. The structure of the DUBM includes a day camera and an uncooled thermal imager, a 7.62-mm machine gun with maximum angle vertical guidance 60 °; this weapon station is especially useful during silent surveillance and firing at high-lying targets in built-up areas. As a result of all these innovations, the weight of the Challenger 2 TES tank has increased from 62.5 tons to 74.84 tons.

In principle, tanks in the TES variant could be first proposed for the leading armored group LABG, although much will depend on future combat operations. But to date, the soldiers of the reformed LABG have never been trained on TES tanks, and if these vehicles are urgently sent there, then it is likely that a decision will be made to remove new systems from them, with which the crews are practically unfamiliar, in particular silencers SVU and DBM. At its current location, the DBM closes the 30 ° sector in the commander’s field of vision, and this is a significant drawback when firing from a tank gun, and the DBM operator himself is unlikely to be able to mitigate it, since in such circumstances he will be slightly busy performing his direct duties as a loader.

The second, one might say less reference model Challenger 2 TES, was recently assembled at the ATDU Center. Here, the main emphasis was placed on a set of passive armor, adapted to the likely threats of hybrid warfare. Compared to the range of weapons for peacekeeping operations, they can be expected to use a wider range of weapons systems, including weapons, such as anti-tank guided missiles and new generation tank ammunition.

The closure of the capacity extension program deprived the remaining tanks of many systems that would allow raising the current generation vehicles to a different technological level. It is useful to recall, for example, that British tanks (unlike the export version of the Challenger 2E or competitors such as the third-generation M1A2 Abrams, Leopard 2 and Leclerc tanks offered for the British Army competition to replace the original Chieftain tank) still do not have an independent thermal imaging channel commander. The Challenger 2 tank has a commander's panoramic sight, which allows you to work in search-strike mode (quick exchange of target designation data between the commander and gunner), but only in daytime conditions, since this sight has never been equipped with a night channel. Thus, the crew cannot use the search and strike mode at night or in poor visibility conditions, with the exception of targets that fall into the limited field of view of the thermal imaging unit installed on the gun mask, the image from which can be seen by the commander and gunner operator.

Some newer tanks, such as the Israeli Merkava 3 Baz and Merkava 4, the Japanese Type 90, have automatic target tracking, but again this is not about the Challenger 2 tank. Its future comrades, the Scout and the Warrior CSP variant, will have such a system; a similar system is installed on one of Scout's predecessors, the Ulan tracked armored personnel carrier. This machine has been in service with the Austrian army for more than ten years, which from the very beginning insisted (like the "perceptive" Israeli army) on the integration of this system, which speeds up the process of capturing moving targets, increases the likelihood of hitting at long distances, saves ammunition and shortens the combat cycle. preparation.

The Challenger 2 tank never had an integrated inertial navigation system or even a GPS receiver (before the installation of Bowman systems), although they were installed on the Challenger 1 tank back in 1991. The VAGR (Vehicle Applique GPS Receiver) currently installed must be physically connected to the Bowman VHF radio, but for ergonomic reasons, some experienced tank commanders have apparently decided to install their own receivers.

As one of them explained, in addition to its use when dismounting from a tank, its Garmin pocket receiver can be strapped on the outside in front of viewing devices. Thus, in a combat position at a glance, he can see the coordinates through one of the observation blocks, which allows him to report his coordinates at any opportunity. Also convenient is that the AA batteries for the Garmin receiver are exactly the same as for the night vision goggles used during night marches.

In anticipation of greater participation in the fighting in the settlements, the armies of France, Germany and the United States in recent years have moved to install telephones in their tanks to communicate with the infantry. Since the Second World War, all British tanks have had such telephones as standard; the Challenger 2 tank was no exception until its original analog phone was removed due to incompatibility with digital system Bowman intercom. Only tanks in the TES variant received digital phones to communicate with the infantry.

As a result of the experience of the US participation in Operation Desert Storm in 1991, thermal imagers of the driver became standard on Abrams tanks and Bradley infantry fighting vehicles of the American army, not only because of its increased range, but also due to the fact that the image from it allows the driver to see on the way of the tank both buried and laid on the surface of the mines. For night driving, the base Challenger 2 tanks are still equipped with surveillance devices with enhanced image brightness.

Not to mention the fact that there are no remotely controlled combat modules on British tanks, unlike, for example, Israeli and American vehicles. There is not even a simplified version of the Selex Enforcer DBM mounted on a tank in the TES configuration, a Bulldog armored personnel carrier (with a 12.7 mm machine gun) and a Panther communications vehicle (with a 7.62 mm machine gun).

In the British army, the Enforcer DBMS, as a system installed as part of an urgent need, is something like a “adhesive plaster” - a quick and economical solution for installation on platforms when there is neither time nor special requirements for installation properly. In the case of the Challenger 2 TES variant, it can only be fired when the tank is stopped, since neither the armament nor the image with color and thermal imaging cameras is stabilized. Although the Enforcer module can be controlled remotely, on a British tank only the loader can fire from it remotely, and images from the color and thermal imaging camera of the module can again only be seen by the loader, since the installation of the module did not provide for integration with the rest of the vehicle's electronics (whose data bus 1553B does not have the ability to process video). Since this DBM module does not have a rangefinder and is not integrated with the vehicle's navigation system, it cannot be used to determine the coordinates of targets (required for transfer to other platforms), as some operators of combat modules are accustomed to doing.

Challenger X2 - reliable protection for your car!

Standard System Features

Dynamic code

Passive/active arming of the system.

Separate control of security on/off buttons.

Control of code blocking relay R350 (additional option).

The function of automatic safe blocking of doors by pressing the "Stop" pedal, by a signal from an external speed sensor or motion sensor when the ignition is on.

The function of safe sequential opening of the driver and passenger doors of the car.

System of active protection against theft and seizure of the car (work with anti-burglary card (option)).

Passive immobilizer function with the ability to work with anti-theft card LDT920(S) and external sensor movement.

Programmable personal code.

Possibility manual setting system to full armed mode at any time using the "Valet" button, even if the ignition key is not available.

Remote control of the "Panic" function in all modes.

Protection of the perimeter, hood, trunk.

Immediate triggering of an alarm when the system power is turned off/on in the Armed mode.

Multi-channel programmable "Anti-Hi-Jack" function with remote and automatic activation.

Emergency call with the CALL button from inside the car.

Additional functions

Two circuits of additional interlocks (NC, NO) (requires installation of additional relays).

Built-in tail light control relay.

Built-in universal power output for controlling door locks.

Two connectors for connecting two-level sensors (impact, volume, displacement).

Clock, alarm clock.

"SAVE" mode, which allows you to save the battery of the key fob transmitter.

Three programmable channels for controlling vehicle service devices.

Two remotely controlled channels by service devices.

Additional (programmable) channel for controlling an external pager, executive device.

Automatic adaptive ("smart") "Turbotimer".

Remote control of the "Turbotimer" function from the key fob transmitter (on/off, selection of operating time).

car security systems

Important

The system has five independent (two of them are remotely controlled)
functionally reprogrammable channels. These are five physical wires
lines with programmable logic of operation, providing flexible change
system functions for controlling the shutdown of turbocharged engines
lei (turbo timer), remote shutdown of the system siren in the "Night"
mode with control channel of an additional pager or device
mobile communications, car security service with running engine without key
ignition timing, control additional devices at a given time
variable intervals, engine start control.

The interactive pager provides confirmation signals that you

command completion by the system. During one security cycle, the security system
chitaet output information about each triggered sensor on the LCD display
two-way key fob.

To ensure the highest level of protection for your vehicle, this

the security system has a programmable manual shutdown function.
In some cases, such as when the remote control transmitter
system control is lost or not working (or your key fob
the transmitter is blocked by powerful radio emission from a jamming device
ka”), you may need to manually install or manually remove the system
security theme. Read the sections "Manual arming the system"
and "Manual disabling the security system", which describe in detail about
procedures for arming and disarming the system in such a situation. Except
moreover, in this manual a table is given, in one of the sections of which
system functions used, including selected shutdown method
systems, and optional equipment installed in the car. Although
By default, the "Secret code" function is not programmed (to disable
system, you must enter a personal code), to turn off the system
the "Valet" switch can also be selected. See what method was
programmed to shut down your system, and familiarize yourself with
appropriate section of this manual.

If the function F16 "Secret code" is programmed, then the recording of codes

new key fobs, change secret code, change the program status
functions F15 to F29, emergency disarming of the system, disabling
The system can only be damaged when triggered in the “Anti Hi Jack” modes
after entering the secret code! Changing function parameters from F1 to F14
does not require entering a secret code and is always available.

Car security system with two-way communication, five service channels,
interactive LCD pager, passive and active anti-theft protection systems
and hijacking a car automatic start motor with built-in relays.

Installation and use guide

To ensure the highest level of protection for your car, this multifunctional security system has built-in passive and active immobilizers with the ability to control an anti-burglar transponder (tag purchased separately), the function of phased disarming, sequential safe unlocking of the driver’s and then the passenger’s car doors, multi-level AHJ, as well as the arming function even without a car ignition key. Control and setting of automatic start parameters can be carried out remotely from the key fob transmitter. A new type of dynamic coding, reliable communication within a line-of-sight radius of up to 2 km, five service channels, an interactive LCD pager, passive and active protection systems against car theft and seizure, automatic engine start with built-in relays allow you to implement non-standard opportunities for security, service and comfort . Thanks to the remote engine start system, 100% control of any power units of cars with manual transmission, automatic transmission, as well as turbocharged engines in real time, according to a cyclic timer and temperature, is provided. Automatic engine start control can be carried out both with and without breaking the ignition circuit of the car without the use of additional components. Engine shutdown and arming is carried out with one press of the “Security” button on the transmitter key fob (One touch function) for vehicles with manual transmission, and also regardless of the type of transmission during automatic and manual arming. Provides operation of the system in all modes with a remote blocking code relay R350.

Standard System Features

• Dynamic code CFMII.
• Passive/active arming of the system.
• Separate control of security on/off buttons.
• Possibility of disarming in two stages (AV-function), as well as disabling with anti-burglary card LDT920(S).
• Control of code blocking relay R350 (additional option).
• The function of automatic safe blocking of doors by pressing the "Stop" pedal, by a signal from an external speed sensor or motion sensor when the ignition is on.
• The function of safe sequential opening of the driver and passenger doors of the car (function additional channel CH3).
• System of active protection against theft and capture of the car (work with anti-burglary card LDT920(S), option not included).
• Passive immobilizer function with the ability to work with the LDT920(S) anti-burglary card and an external movement sensor.
• Programmable personal code to disable and control the system.
• The ability to manually arm the system in full protection mode at any time using the "Valet" button, even in the absence of an ignition key.
• Remote control of the panic function in all modes.
• Protection of the perimeter, hood, trunk, by pressing the "Stop" pedal, by turning on the ignition, by the beginning of the movement of the car (when using a vehicle speed sensor), warning zones and main zones (independently) of two sensors (two connectors for connecting sensors).
• Immediate triggering of an alarm when the system power is turned off/on in the Armed mode.
• Multi-channel programmable "Anti Hi Jack" function with remote activation or automatically activated when the ignition is turned on or when the limit switches DOOR (+), DOOR (-), STOP (+) are activated, the car starts to move (Sensor 2) when the ignition is on.
• Emergency call with the CALL button from inside the car.

Additional functions

• Two circuits of additional interlocks (NC, NO) (requires installation of additional relays).
• Built-in tail light control relay.
• Built-in universal power output for controlling door locks.
• Two connectors for connecting two-level sensors (impact, volume, displacement).
• Alarm clock.
• "SAVE" mode - power saving control of the two-way communication key fob.
• “SET” mode - enabling real-time engine start control by the “Start” or “Start” / “Stop” signals sent by the two-way communication key fob.
• Three programmable channels for controlling car service devices (service impulses, trigger channels, timer channels, power window control, polite backlight output, etc.).
• Two remotely controlled channels by service devices with a programmable logic. Powerful control output (25 A) for opening the trunk with temporary shutdown of sensors and the trunk protection channel.
• Additional (programmable) channel for controlling an external pager, executive device.
• Automatic adaptive ("smart") turbo timer.
• Remote control of the "Turbotimer" function from the key fob transmitter (on / off, selection of operating time).