Free energy generator: diagrams, instructions, description. Using a permanent magnet to generate energy and get out of the energy dependence of mankind Getting electricity from permanent magnets

From this article you will learn how to use the energy of the magnetic current in household appliances. own production. In the article you will find detailed descriptions and assembly diagrams simple devices based on the interaction of magnets and a do-it-yourself induction coil.

Using energy in a familiar way is easy. It is enough to pour fuel into the tank or turn on the device in electrical network. At the same time, such methods, as a rule, are the most expensive and have serious consequences for nature - colossal natural resources are spent on the production and operation of mechanisms.

In order to get working household appliances, you don’t always need an impressive 220 volts or a loud and bulky internal combustion engine. We will consider the possibility of creating simple, but useful appliances with unlimited potential.

Technologies for the application of modern powerful magnets develop reluctantly - the oil-extracting and processing industries risk being out of work. The future of all actuators and activators lies precisely with magnets, the effectiveness of which can be verified by assembling simple appliances based on their own hands.

Visual video of the action of magnets

Fan with magnetic motor

To create such a device, you will need small neodymium magnets - 2 or 4 pcs. As a portable fan, it is best to use a cooler from a computer power supply, because it already has almost everything you need to create a stand-alone fan. The main details - induction coils and an elastic magnet are already present in the factory product.

In order to make the propeller rotate, it is enough to place the magnets opposite the static coils, fixing them at the corners of the cooler frame. External magnets, interacting with the coil, will create a magnetic field. An elastic magnet (magnetic tire) located in the propeller turret will provide a constant uniform resistance, and the movement will be maintained by itself. The larger and more powerful the magnets, the more powerful the fan will be.

This engine is conditionally called "perpetual", because there is no information that the neodymium has "run out of charge" or the fan is out of order. But the fact that it works productively and stably is confirmed by many users.

Video how to assemble a magnetic fan

Magnetic fan generator

An induction coil has one almost miraculous property - when a magnet rotates around it, an electrical impulse occurs. This means that the whole device has the opposite effect - if we make the propeller spin by extraneous forces, we can generate electricity. But how to spin a turret with a propeller?

The answer is obvious - all the same magnetic field. To do this, we place small (10x10 mm) magnets on the blades and fix them with glue or tape. The more magnets, the stronger the impulse. To rotate the propeller, ordinary ferrite magnets will suffice. We connect the LED to the former power wires and give the turret an impulse.

Generator from a cooler and magnets - video instruction

Such a device can be improved by placing additionally one or more magnetic tires from propellers on the cooler frame. You can also include diode bridges and capacitors in the network (in front of the light bulb) - this will allow you to straighten the current and stabilize the pulses, getting even constant light.

The properties of neodymium are extremely interesting - its light weight and powerful energy give an effect that is noticeable even on crafts (experimental devices) of a household level. Movement is made possible by efficient design bearing turret coolers and drives - the friction force is minimal. The ratio of mass and energy of neodymium provides ease of movement, which gives a wide field for experiments at home.

Free energy on video - magnetic motor

The field of application of magnetic fans is due to their autonomy. First of all, these are vehicles, trains, gatehouses, remote parking lots. Another indisputable advantage - noiselessness - makes it convenient in the house. You can install such a device as an auxiliary in the system natural ventilation(for example, in the bathroom). Any place where a constant small airflow is needed is suitable for this fan.

Flashlight with "eternal" recharging

This miniature device will be useful not only in an "emergency" case, but also for those involved in prevention. engineering networks, surveying the premises or returning home from work late. The design of the flashlight is primitive, but original - even a schoolboy can handle its assembly. However, it has its own induction generator.

1 - diode bridge; 2 - coil; 3 - magnet; 4 - batteries 3x1.2 V; 5 - switch; 6 - LEDs

For work you will need:

Thick marker (body).
Copper wireØ 0.15-0.2 mm - about 25 m (can be taken from an old coil).
The light element is LEDs (ideally, the head is from a regular flashlight).
Batteries standard 4A, capacity 250 mA / h (from the battery "Krona") - 3 pcs.
Rectifier diodes type 1H4007 (1H4148) - 4 pcs.
Toggle switch or button.
Copper wireØ 1 mm, small magnet (preferably neodymium).
glue gun, soldering iron.

Working process:

1. Disassemble the marker, remove the contents, cut off the rod holder (there should be a plastic tube).

2. Install the flashlight head (illuminating element) into the removable flask cover.

3. Solder the diodes according to the scheme.

4. Group the batteries adjacently so that they can be placed in the body of the marker (flashlight body). Connect the batteries in series, on the spike.

5. Mark out a section of the hull so that you can see free space, not occupied by batteries. Here will be arranged induction coil and magnetic generator.

6. Winding the coil. This operation must be carried out in accordance with the following rules:

Breaking the wire is not allowed. If it breaks, rewind the coil again.
The winding should start and end in the same place, do not break the wire in the middle after reaching required amount turns (500 for ferromagnet and 350 for neodymium).
Winding quality does not crucial, but only in this case. The main requirements are the number of turns and uniform distribution over the body.
You can fix the coil on the body with ordinary tape.

7. To test the functionality magnetic generator you need to solder the ends of the coil - one to the lamp body, the second - to the output of the LEDs (use soldering acid). Then place the magnets in the case and shake a few times. If the lamps are working and everything is done correctly, the LEDs will respond to electromagnetic fluctuations with weak flashes. These oscillations will subsequently be rectified by the diode bridge and converted into D.C., which will accumulate batteries.

8. Install the magnets in the generator compartment and cover it with hot glue or sealant (so that the magnets do not stick to the batteries).

9. Bring the antennae of the coil inside the case and solder it to the diode bridge, then connect the bridge to the batteries, and the batteries to the lamp through the key. All connections should be soldered according to the scheme.

10. Install all parts in the body and make coil protection (adhesive tape, casing or heat shrink tape).

Video how to make an eternal flashlight

Such a flashlight will be recharged if it is shaken - the magnets must walk along the coil to generate impulses. Neodymium magnets can be found in a DVD, CD drive, or computer hard drive. They are also freely available suitable option NdFeB N33 D4x2 mm costs about 2-3 rubles. (0.02-0.03 c.u.). The remaining parts, if they are not available, will cost no more than 60 rubles. (1 c.u.).

There are special generators for the implementation of magnetic energy, but they have not received wide distribution due to the powerful influence of the oil and processing industries. However, devices based on electromagnetic induction hardly, but break into the market and you can buy highly efficient induction furnaces and even heating boilers. The technology is also widely used in electric vehicles, wind generators and magnetic motors.

In this article, we will consider the model powerful generator from magnets, which is capable of generating electricity with a power of 300 watts. The frame is assembled from dural plates 10 mm thick. The generator consists of 3 main parts: housing, rotor, stator. The main purpose of the housing is to fix the rotor and stator in a strictly defined position. The rotating rotor must not touch the stator coils with magnets. The duralumin case is assembled from 4 parts. The angular layout provides a simple and rigid structure. The body is made on a CNC machine. This is both a plus and a disadvantage of the development, since for a high-quality repetition of the model, you need to find specialists and a CNC machine. The diameter of the discs is 100 mm.

You can also take a ready-made electric generator in the online store.

The rotor of the electric generator I. Belitsky

Rotor is an iron axle. 2 are attached to it. iron disk with neodymium magnets located on them. An iron bushing is pressed between the discs on the axle. Its length depends on the thickness of the stator. Its purpose is to provide a minimum gap between the rotating magnets and the stator coils. Each disk contains 12 neodymium magnets with a diameter of 15 mm and a thickness of 5 mm. For them seats are made on a disk.

They need to be glued epoxy resin or other glue. In this case, it is necessary to strictly observe the polarity. AT assembled condition the magnets should be positioned so that opposite each is another from the opposite disk. In this case, the poles must be different towards each other. As the author of the development himself writes (Igor Beletsky): “It will be right to have different poles, so that the lines of force come out of one and enter the other, definitely S = N.” You can buy neodymium magnets in a Chinese online store.

Stator device

Sheet textolite 12 m thick was used as a base. Holes for coils and rotor bushings were made in the sheet. The outer diameter of the iron coils that are installed in these holes is 25 mm. The inner diameter is equal to the diameter of the magnets (15 mm). Coils perform 2 tasks: the function of a magnetically conductive core and the task of reducing sticking when moving from one coil to another.

Coils are made from insulated wire 0.5 mm thick. 130 turns are wound on each coil. The direction of winding is the same for all.

When creating a powerful generator from, you need to know that the higher the speed that can be provided, the higher the output voltage and current of the device will be for free energy.

Energy from the field of a permanent magnet

Implementation (18.08.2004)

To implement this project (let's call it TEG, as a derivative of two designs: Floyd Sweet's VTA and Tom Burden's MEG :)) I took two ferrite ring core brand M2000NM with dimensions of O40xO25x11 mm, put them together, fastened with electrical tape, and wound the collector (output) winding around the perimeter of the core - 105 turns with PEV-1 wire in 6 layers, also securing each layer with electrical tape.

Next, we wrap it again with electrical tape and wind the modulator coil (input) on top. We wind it as usual - toroidal. I wound 400 turns in two PEV-0.3 wires, i.e. it turned out two windings of 400 turns. This was done in order to expand the variants of the experiment.

Now we place this whole system between two magnets. In my case, these were barium oxide magnets, M22RA220-1 grade material, magnetized in a magnetic field with a strength of at least 640,000 A / m, dimensions 80x60x16 mm. The magnets were taken from a magnetic-discharge diode pump NMD 0.16-1 or the like. The magnets are oriented "at attraction" and their magnetic lines penetrate the ferrite rings along the axis.

TEG assembly (diagram).

The work of the TEG is as follows. Initially, the magnetic field strength inside the collector coil is higher than outside due to the presence of ferrite inside. If the core is saturated, then its magnetic permeability will drop sharply, which will lead to a decrease in tension inside the collector coil. Those. we need to create such a current in the modulating coil in order to saturate the core. By the time the core is saturated, the voltage across the collector coil will increase. When the voltage is removed from the control coil, the field strength will increase again, which will lead to a reverse polarity surge at the output. The idea in the stated form was born somewhere in the middle of February 2004.

In principle, one modulator coil is sufficient. The control unit is assembled according to classical pattern on TL494. The top variable resistor in the circuit changes the pulse duty cycle from 0 to about 45% on each channel, the bottom one sets the frequency in the range from about 150 Hz to 20 kHz. When using one channel, the frequency, respectively, is halved. The circuit also provides current protection through the modulator at about 5A.

TEG assembled (appearance).

TEG parameters (measured with multimeter MY-81):

winding resistance:
collector - 0.5 Ohm
modulators - 11.3 ohms and 11.4 ohms

collector - 1.16 mH
modulators - 628 mH and 627 mH

collector - 1.15 mH
modulators - 375 mH and 374 mH

Experiment No. 1 (19.08.2004)

The modulator coils are connected in series, so it looks like a bifilar. One generator channel was used. The inductance of the modulator is 1.52 H, the resistance is 22.7 Ohm. The power supply of the control unit here and below is 15 V, the oscillograms were taken with a two-beam oscilloscope S1-55. The first channel (lower beam) is connected through a 1:20 divider (Cin 17 pF, Rin 1 MΩ), the second channel (upper beam) is connected directly (Cin 40 pF, Rin 1 MΩ). There is no load in the collector circuit.

The first thing that was noticed was that after removing the pulse from the control coil, resonant oscillations occur in it, and if the next pulse is applied at the moment of antiphase to the resonant surge, then at that moment a pulse appears at the output of the collector. Also, this phenomenon was noticed without magnets, but to a much lesser extent. That is, let's say, in this case, the steepness of the potential change on the winding is important. The pulse amplitude at the output could reach 20 V. However, the current of such surges is very small, and it is difficult to charge a 100 μF capacitance connected to the output through a rectifier bridge. The output does not pull any other load. At a high frequency of the generator, when the modulator current is extremely small, and the shape of the voltage pulses on it retains rectangular shape, emissions are also present at the output, although the magnetic circuit is still very far from saturation.

So far, nothing significant has happened. Let's just take a look at some of the effects. :)

Here, I think it would be fair to note that there is at least one other person - a certain Sergey A, who is experimenting with the same system. His description was casually on www.skif.biz/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=48&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15. I swear, we came up with this idea completely independently :). How far his research went, I do not know, I did not contact him. But he also noted similar effects.

Experiment No. 2 (19.08.2004)

The modulator coils are disconnected and connected to two channels of the generator, and are connected in opposite directions, i.e. alternately creates a magnetic flux in the ring in different directions. Coil inductances are given above in TEG parameters. The measurements were carried out as in the previous experiment. There is no load on the collector.

The oscillograms below show the voltage on one of the modulator windings and the current through the modulator (left) and also the voltage on the modulator winding and the voltage at the collector output (right) at different pulse durations. I will not indicate the amplitudes and temporal characteristics for now, firstly, I did not save them all, and secondly, this is not important yet, while we try to qualitatively track the behavior of the system.

The first series of oscillograms shows that at a certain modulator current, the voltage at the collector output reaches a maximum - this is an intermediate moment before the core goes into saturation, its magnetic permeability begins to fall. At this moment, the modulator is turned off and the magnetic field is restored in the collector coil, which is accompanied by a negative surge at the output. On the next series of oscillograms, the pulse duration is increased, and the core reaches full saturation - the change in the magnetic flux stops and the output voltage is zero (decline in the positive region). This is followed again by a reverse surge when the modulator winding is turned off.

Now let's try to exclude magnets from the system, keeping the mode of operation.

It seems that the idea, in the form in which it was laid down, is working.

Experiment No. 3 (19.08.2004)

The modulator coils are again connected in series, as in the 1st experiment. Counter serial connection absolutely no effect. I did not expect anything else :). Connected properly. The work is checked both in idle mode and with load. The oscillograms below show the modulator current (upper beam) and the output voltage (lower beam) at various pulse durations on the modulator. Here and below, I decided to be tied to the current of the modulators, as to the most suitable in the role of the reference signal. Oscillograms were taken relative to the common wire. The first 3 figures are in idle mode, the last one is with load.

Power measurements in the load were not carried out, something else is interesting:

I don't know what to think... Consumption decreased by 0.3%. The generator itself without TEG consumes 18.5 mA. It is possible that the load indirectly affected the inductance of the modulators through a change in the distribution of the magnetic field. Although, if we compare the waveforms of the current through the modulator in idle mode and with the load (for example, when scrolling back and forth in ACDSee), then we can notice a slight blockage of the peak top when working with the load. An increase in the inductance would lead to a decrease in the peak width. Although it's all very illusory...

Experiment No. 4 (20.08.2004)

The goal is set: to get the maximum output on what is. In the last experiment, I ran into the frequency limit, at which the optimal pulse duration was ensured at the maximum possible level pulse filling ~ 45% (duty cycle is minimal). So it was necessary to reduce the inductance of the modulator winding (previously two were connected in series), but in this case the current would have to be increased. So now the modulator coils are connected separately to both outputs of the generator, as in the 2nd experiment, however this time they are connected in one direction (as indicated in circuit diagram generator). At the same time, the oscillograms changed (they were taken relative to the common wire). They look much nicer :). In addition, we now have two windings that work alternately. So for the same maximum pulse duration, we can double the frequency (for this circuit).

A certain mode of operation of the generator is selected according to the maximum brightness of the lamp at the output. So, as usual, let's move on to the drawings...

Here, on the left, we clearly see an increase in the voltage on the modulator winding during the operation of the second one (the second half-cycle, logical "0" on the right waveform). Emissions when the modulator is turned off at 60 volts are limited by diodes that are part of the field switches.

The load is the same lamp 6.3 V, 0.22 A. And the picture with consumption repeats again ...

Again we have a decrease in consumption with a load connected to the collector. The measurements are of course at the threshold of the accuracy of the device, but, nevertheless, the repeatability is 100%. The power in the load was about 156 mW. At the input - 9.15 watts. And about " perpetual motion machine So far no one has spoken :)

Here you can admire the burning light bulb:

Findings:

The effect is obvious. What we can get from this - time will tell. What should you pay attention to? First, increase the number of turns of the collector, perhaps by adding a couple more rings, but it would be better to choose optimal dimensions magnetic circuit. Who would do the math? ;) Perhaps it makes sense to increase the magnetic permeability of the magnetoargument. This should increase the difference in magnetic field strengths inside and outside the coil. At the same time, the inductance of the modulator would be reduced. It was also thought that gaps were needed between the ring and the magnet, so that, let's say, there was room for bending magnetic lines when changing the properties of the medium - magnetic permeability. However, in practice, this only leads to a voltage drop at the output. AT this moment the gaps are determined by 3 layers of electrical tape and the thickness of the modulator winding, by eye it is a maximum of 1.5 mm on each side.

Experiment No. 4.1 (08/21/2004)

The previous experiments were carried out at work. Brought the control unit and "transformer" home. I had the same set of magnets lying around at home for a long time. Collected. I was surprised to find that I can raise the frequency even more. Apparently my "home" magnets were a little stronger, as a result of which the inductance of the modulators decreased. The radiators were already getting hotter, but the current consumption of the circuit was 0.56 A and 0.55 A without load and with load, respectively, with the same 15 V power supply. There may have been a through current through the keys. In this scheme, at high frequency, this is not excluded. I connected a 2.5 V, 0.3A halogen bulb to the output. The load received 1.3 V, 200 mA. Total input 8.25 W, output 0.26 W - efficiency 3.15%. But note, again without the expected traditional influence on the source!

Experiment No. 5 (08/26/2004)

A new transducer (version 1.2) was assembled on a ring with a higher permeability - M10000NM, the dimensions are the same: O40xO25x11 mm. Unfortunately, there was only one ring. To fit more turns on the collector winding, the wire is taken thinner. Total: a collector of 160 turns with a wire O 0.3 and also two modulators of 235 turns each, also with a wire O 0.3. A new power supply was also found up to 100 V and a current of up to 1.2 A. The supply voltage can also play a role, since it provides the rate of current rise through the modulator, and that, in turn, the rate of change in the magnetic flux, which is directly related with the amplitude of the output voltage.

So far there is nothing to measure the inductance and capture pictures. Therefore, without frills, I will state the bare figures. Several measurements were made at different supply voltages and generator operating modes. Below are some of them.

without reaching full saturation

Input: 20V x 0.3A = 6W
Efficiency: 3.6%

Input: 10V x 0.6A = 6W
Output: 9V x 24mA = 0.216W
Efficiency: 3.6%

Input: 15V x 0.5A = 7.5W
Output: 11V x 29mA = 0.32W
Efficiency: 4.2%

with full saturation

Input: 15V x 1.2A = 18W
Output: 16V x 35mA = 0.56W
Efficiency: 3.1%

It turned out that in the full saturation mode, there is a decrease in efficiency, since the modulator current increases sharply. Optimal mode work (in terms of efficiency) was achieved at a supply voltage of 15 V. No load effect on the power supply was detected. For the 3rd example given with an efficiency of 4.2, the current of the circuit connected with the load should increase by about 20 mA, but the increase was also not recorded.

Experiment No. 6 (2.09.2004)

Some of the modulator turns have been removed in order to increase the frequency and reduce the gaps between the ring and the magnet. Now we have two modulator windings of 118 turns wound in one layer. The collector is left unchanged - 160 turns. In addition, measured electrical characteristics new converter.

TEG parameters (version 1.21), measured with multimeter MY-81:

winding resistance:
collector - 8.9 Ohm
modulators - 1.5 Ohm each

winding inductance without magnets:
collector - 3.37 mH
modulators - 133.4 mH each
serially connected modulators - 514 mH

winding inductance with installed magnets:
collector - 3.36 mH
modulators - 89.3 mH each
serially connected modulators - 357 mH

Below I present the results of two measurements of the TEG operation in different modes. With more high voltage supply modulation frequency is higher. In both cases, the modulators are connected in series.

Input: 15V x 0.55A = 8.25W
Output: 1.88V x 123mA = 0.231W
Efficiency: 2.8%

Input: 19.4V x 0.81A = 15.714W
Output: 3.35V x 176mA = 0.59W
Efficiency: 3.75%

The first and the saddest. After making changes to the modulator, an increase in consumption was recorded when working with a new converter. In the second case, the consumption increased by about 30 mA. Those. without load, the consumption was 0.78 A, with a load - 0.81 A. We multiply by the supply 19.4 V and we get 0.582 W - the same power that was removed from the output. However, I will repeat with all responsibility that this has not been observed before. When the load is connected, in this case, a steeper increase in the current through the modulator is clearly seen, which is a consequence of a decrease in the modulator inductance. What this is connected with is not yet known.

And another fly in the ointment. I am afraid that in this configuration it will not be possible to obtain an efficiency of more than 5% due to the weak overlap of the magnetic field. In other words, by saturating the core, we weaken the field inside the collector coil only in the area where this very core passes. But the magnetic lines coming from the center of the magnet through the center of the coil do not overlap. Moreover, part of the magnetic lines "displaced" from the core when it is saturated also bypasses the latter with inside rings. Those. in this way, only a small part of the PM magnetic flux is modulated. It is necessary to change the geometry of the entire system. Perhaps we should expect some increase in efficiency, using ring magnets from the speakers. The idea of modulators operating in resonance mode does not let go either. However, under conditions of core saturation and, accordingly, constantly changing inductance of modulators, this is not easy to do.

Research continues...

If you want to discuss, go to the "passionate forum" - my nickname Armer. Or write to [email protected], but I think it's better in the forum.

x x x

Dragons Lord: Firstly, thanks a lot Armer" for providing a report on the experiments carried out with magnificent illustrations. I think that Vladislav's new works will soon await us. In the meantime, I will express my thoughts about this project and its possible way improvements. I propose to change the generator circuit as follows:

It is also proposed to use an additional external magnetic circuit, which concentrates the lines of force in the working area of the device, making it more powerful (here it is important not to overdo it, because we use the idea of fully saturating the central core). Structurally, the external magnetic circuit is a turned ferromagnetic parts of axisymmetric geometry (something like a pipe with flanges). You can see the horizontal line of the connector of the upper and lower "cups" in the picture. Or, it can be discrete independent magnetic circuits (brackets).

Further, it is worth thinking about improving the process from an "electrical" point of view. It is clear - the first thing to do is to swing the primary circuit into resonance. After all, we have no harmful feedback from the secondary circuit. It is proposed to use the CURRENT resonance for obvious reasons (after all, the goal is to saturate the core). The second remark, perhaps, is not so obvious at first glance. It is proposed to use as a secondary winding not a standard solenoid coil winding, but to make several flat bifilar coils Tesla and place them on the outer diameter of the magnetic circuit with a "puff pastry", connecting in series. In order to generally remove the existing minimal interaction with each other in the axial direction of neighboring bifilar coils, you need to connect them also THROUGH ONE, returning from the last to the second ( reuse the meaning of the bifilar).

Thus, due to the maximum potential difference in two adjacent turns, the stored energy of the secondary circuit will be the maximum possible, which is an order of magnitude greater than the variant with a conventional solenoid. As can be seen from the diagram, in view of the fact that the "pie" of bifilars has a fairly decent length in the horizontal direction, it is proposed to wind the primary not on top of the secondary, but under it. Directly to the magnetic circuit.

As I said, using rings, it is impossible to overcome a certain efficiency limit. And I assure you that there is no smell of super-unity there. The magnetic lines forced out of the central magnetic circuit will go around it along the surface itself (along the shortest path), thereby still crossing the area limited by the turns of the secondary. Design analysis forces us to abandon the current circuitry. You need a central magnetic circuit WITHOUT a hole. Let's take a look at the following diagram:

The main magnetic core is assembled from separate plates or rods of rectangular section, and is a parallelepiped. The primary is placed directly on it. Its axis is horizontal and looks at us according to the scheme. Secondary, still a "puff pie" from Tesla bifilars. Now we note that we have introduced an additional (secondary) magnetic circuit, which is a "cup" with holes in their bottoms. The gap between the edge of the hole and the main central magnetic circuit (primary coil) should be minimal in order to effectively intercept the displaced magnetic lines and pull them towards itself, preventing them from passing through the bifilars. Of course, it should be noted that the magnetic permeability of the central magnetic circuit should be an order of magnitude higher than that of the auxiliary one. For example: the central parallelepiped - 10000, "cups" - 1000. In the normal (not saturated) state, the central core, due to its greater magnetic permeability, will draw magnetic lines into itself.

And now the most interesting;) . Let's take a closer look - what did we get? ... And we got the most common MEG, only in the "unfinished" version. In other words, I want to say that the classical performance MEG generator v.4.0 overtakes ours a couple of times the best scheme, in view of its ability to redistribute the magnetic lines (shaking the "swing") to remove useful energy throughout the entire cycle of its work. Moreover, from both arms of the magnetic circuit. In our case, we have a one-arm design. We simply do not use half of the possible efficiency.

Free energy, alternative energy

Many people are trying to implement the idea embodied in the device described below. Its essence is as follows: there is a permanent magnet (PM) - a hypothetical energy source, an output coil (collector) and a modulator that changes the distribution of the PM magnetic field, thereby creating a variable magnetic flux in the coil.
Implementation (18.08.2004)
To implement this project (let's call it TEG, as a derivative of two designs: Floyd Sweet's VTA and Tom Bearden's MEG 🙂), I took two ferrite ring cores of the M2000NM brand with dimensions of O40xO25x11 mm, put them together, fastened with electrical tape, and wound the collector (output) winding along the perimeter of the core - 105 turns with PEV-1 wire in 6 layers, also securing each layer with electrical tape.

Now we place this whole system between two magnets. In my case, these were barium oxide magnets, material grade M22RA220-1, magnetized in a magnetic field with a strength of at least 640,000 A / m,
dimensions 80x60x16 mm. The magnets were taken from a magnetic-discharge diode pump NMD 0.16-1 or the like. The magnets are oriented "at attraction" and their magnetic lines penetrate the ferrite rings along the axis.

TEG assembly (diagram).

The work of the TEG is as follows. Initially, the magnetic field strength inside the collector coil is higher than outside due to the presence of ferrite inside. If you saturate the core, then it
the magnetic permeability will decrease sharply, which will lead to a decrease in the tension inside the collector coil. Those. we need to create such a current in the modulating coil in order to saturate the core. By the time the core is saturated, the voltage across the collector coil will increase. When the voltage is removed from the control coil, the field strength will increase again, which will lead to a reverse polarity surge at the output. The idea in the stated form was born somewhere in the middle of February 2004.

In principle, one modulator coil is sufficient. Control block
assembled according to the classical scheme on TL494. Upper scheme variable
the resistor changes the duty cycle of the pulses from 0 to about 45% on each
channel, lower - sets the frequency in the range from about 150 Hz to 20
kHz. When using one channel, the frequency, respectively,
is reduced by half. The circuit also provides for current protection through
modulator at about 5A.

TEG assembled (appearance).

TEG parameters (measured with multimeter MY-81):
winding resistance:
collector - 0.5 Ohm
modulators - 11.3 ohms and 11.4 ohms

collector - 1.16 mH
modulators - 628 mH and 627 mH

collector - 1.15 mH
modulators - 375 mH and 374 mH
Experiment No. 1 (19.08.2004)
The modulator coils are connected in series, so it looks like a bifilar. One generator channel was used. The inductance of the modulator is 1.52 H, the resistance is 22.7 ohms. Control box power
here and below 15 V, the oscillograms were taken with a two-beam oscilloscope C1-55. The first channel (lower beam) is connected through a 1:20 divider (Cin 17 pF, Rin 1 MΩ), the second channel (upper beam) is connected directly (Cin 40 pF, Rin 1 MΩ). There is no load in the collector circuit.
The first thing that was noticed was that after removing the pulse from the control coil, resonant oscillations occur in it, and if the next pulse is applied at the moment of antiphase to the resonant surge,
then at this moment there is a pulse at the output of the collector. Also, this phenomenon was noticed without magnets, but to a much lesser extent. That is, let's say, in this case, the steepness of the potential change on the winding is important. The pulse amplitude at the output could reach 20 V. However, the current of such surges is very small, and it is difficult to charge a 100 μF capacitance connected to the output through a rectifier bridge. The output does not pull any other load. At a high frequency of the generator, when the modulator current is extremely small, and the shape of the voltage pulses on it remains rectangular, there are also surges at the output, although the magnetic circuit is still very far from saturation.

Findings:
So far, nothing significant has happened. Let's just take a look at some of the effects. 🙂
Here, I think it would be fair to note that there is at least one other person - a certain Sergey A, who is experimenting with the same system. I swear, we came up with this idea completely independently :). How far his research went, I do not know, I did not contact him. But he also noted similar effects.
Experiment No. 2 (19.08.2004)
The modulator coils are disconnected and connected to two channels of the generator, and are connected in opposite directions, i.e. alternately creates a magnetic flux in the ring in different directions. Coil inductances are given above in TEG parameters. The measurements were carried out as in the previous experiment. There is no load on the collector.
The oscillograms below show the voltage on one of the modulator windings and the current through the modulator (left) and also the voltage on the modulator winding and the voltage at the collector output (right) at
different pulse durations. I will not indicate the amplitudes and temporal characteristics for now, firstly, I did not save them all, and secondly, this is not important yet, while we try to qualitatively track the behavior of the system.

The duty cycle of the pulses on the channel is about 11%, i.e. general - 22%.

The pulse duty cycle on the channel is 17.5%, the total is 35%.

Removed one magnet.

Removed both magnets.

When removing one magnet, the output amplitude decreased by almost 2 times. We also note that the frequency of oscillations has decreased, since the inductance of the modulators has increased. When removing the second magnet,
there is no output signal.
Findings:
It seems that the idea, in the form in which it was laid down, is working.
Experiment No. 3 (19.08.2004)
The modulator coils are again connected in series, as in the 1st experiment. A back-to-back serial connection has absolutely no effect. I did not expect anything else :). Connected properly. The work is checked both in idle mode and with load. The oscillograms below show the modulator current (upper beam) and the output voltage (lower beam) at various pulse durations on the modulator. Here and below, I decided to be tied to the current of the modulators,
as to the most suitable as a reference signal. Oscillograms were taken relative to the common wire. The first 3 figures are in idle mode, the last one is with load.

Figures from left to right and from top to bottom: 1) short pulse duration, 2) increase in duration with approach to the saturation region, 3) optimal duration, full saturation and maximum output
voltage (at no load), 4) last operating mode, but with connected load.
The load was an incandescent lamp 6.3 V, 0.22 A. Of course, this cannot be called a glow ... 🙂

Power measurements in the load were not carried out, something else is interesting:

Findings:
I don't know what to think… Consumption decreased by 0.3%. The generator itself without TEG consumes 18.5 mA. Perhaps the load indirectly through a change in the distribution of the magnetic field affected the inductance
modulators. Although, if we compare the waveforms of the current through the modulator in idle mode and with a load (for example, when scrolling back and forth in ACDSee), then we can notice a slight blockage of the peak top when working with
load. An increase in the inductance would lead to a decrease in the peak width. Although all this is very illusory ...
Experiment No. 4 (20.08.2004)
The goal is set: to get the maximum output on what is. In the last experiment, I ran into the frequency limit at which the optimal pulse duration was provided at the maximum possible pulse filling level of ~ 45% (duty cycle is minimal). So it was necessary to reduce the inductance of the modulator winding (previously two were connected in series), but in this case
you have to increase the current. So now the modulator coils are connected separately to both outputs of the generator, as in the 2nd experiment, however this time they are connected in one direction (as indicated in
generator circuit diagram). At the same time, the oscillograms changed (they were taken relative to the common wire). They look much nicer :). In addition, we now have two windings that work alternately. So for the same maximum pulse duration, we can double the frequency (for this circuit).
A certain mode of operation of the generator is selected according to the maximum brightness of the lamp at the output. So, as usual, let's move on to the drawings ...

The upper beam is the modulator current. The bottom left is the voltage on one of the modulators, on the right is the control pulse of the same channel from the TL494 output.

Here, on the left, we clearly see an increase in voltage on the modulator winding during the operation of the second one (second half-cycle, logical "0" on the right waveform). Emissions when the modulator is turned off at 60 volts are limited by diodes that are part of the field switches.

The upper beam is the modulator current. Bottom left - output voltage with load, right - output voltage at idle.

The load is the same lamp 6.3 V, 0.22 A. And the picture with consumption is repeated again ...

Again we have a decrease in consumption with a load connected to the collector. The measurements are of course at the threshold of the accuracy of the device, but, nevertheless, the repeatability is 100%. The power in the load was about 156
mW. At the input - 9.15 watts. And so far no one has talked about the “perpetual motion machine” 🙂
Here you can admire the burning light bulb:

Findings:
The effect is obvious. What we can get from this - time will tell. What should you pay attention to? First, increase the number of turns of the collector, perhaps by adding a couple more rings, but it would be better to choose
optimal dimensions of the magnetic core. Who would do the math? 😉 Perhaps it makes sense to increase the magnetic permeability of the magnetic circuit. This should increase the difference in magnetic field strengths inside and outside the coil. At the same time, the inductance of the modulator would be reduced. It was also thought that gaps were needed between the ring and the magnet, so that, let's say, there was room for bending magnetic lines when changing the properties of the medium - magnetic permeability. However, in practice, this only leads to a voltage drop at the output. At the moment, the gaps are determined by 3 layers of electrical tape and the thickness of the modulator winding, by eye this is a maximum of 1.5 mm on each side.
Experiment No. 4.1 (08/21/2004)
The previous experiments were carried out at work. Brought the control unit and "transformer" home. I had the same set of magnets lying around at home for a long time. Collected. I was surprised to find that I can raise the frequency even more. Apparently my "home" magnets were a little stronger, as a result of which the inductance of the modulators decreased. The radiators were already getting hotter, but the current consumption of the circuit was 0.56 A and 0.55 A without load and with load, respectively, with the same 15 V power supply. There may have been a through current through the keys. In this scheme, at high frequency, this is not excluded. I connected a 2.5 V, 0.3A halogen bulb to the output. The load received 1.3 V, 200 mA. Total input 8.25 W, output 0.26 W - efficiency 3.15%. But note, again without the expected traditional influence on the source!
Experiment No. 5 (08/26/2004)
A new transducer (version 1.2) was assembled on a ring with a higher permeability — М10000НМ, the dimensions are the same: O40xO25x11 mm. Unfortunately, there was only one ring. To fit more turns on the collector winding, the wire is taken thinner. Total: a collector of 160 turns with a wire O 0.3 and also two modulators of 235 turns each, also with a wire O 0.3. A new power supply was also found up to 100 V and a current of up to 1.2 A. The supply voltage can also play a role, since it provides the rate of current rise through the modulator, and that, in turn, the rate of change in the magnetic flux, which is directly related with the amplitude of the output voltage.
So far there is nothing to measure the inductance and capture pictures. Therefore, without frills, I will state the bare figures. Several measurements were made at different supply voltages and generator operating modes. Below are some of them.
without reaching full saturation

Input: 20V x 0.3A = 6W
Efficiency: 3.6%

Input: 10V x 0.6A = 6W
Output: 9V x 24mA = 0.216W
Efficiency: 3.6% Input: 15V x 0.5A = 7.5W
Output: 11V x 29mA = 0.32W
Efficiency: 4.2%
with full saturation

Input: 15V x 1.2A = 18W
Output: 16V x 35mA = 0.56W
Efficiency: 3.1%
Findings:
It turned out that in the full saturation mode, there is a decrease in efficiency, since the modulator current increases sharply. The optimal operating mode (in terms of efficiency) was achieved at a supply voltage of 15 V. No load effect on the power supply was found. For the 3rd example given with an efficiency of 4.2, the current of the circuit connected with the load should increase by about 20 mA, but the increase was also not recorded.
Experiment No. 6 (2.09.2004)
Some of the modulator turns have been removed in order to increase the frequency and reduce the gaps between the ring and the magnet. Now we have two modulator windings of 118 turns wound in one layer. The collector is left unchanged - 160 turns. In addition, the electrical characteristics of the new converter were measured.

TEG parameters (version 1.21), measured with multimeter MY-81:
winding resistance:
collector - 8.9 Ohm
modulators - 1.5 Ohm each
winding inductance without magnets:
collector - 3.37 mH
modulators - 133.4 mH each
serially connected modulators - 514 mH
winding inductance with installed magnets:
collector - 3.36 mH
modulators - 89.3 mH each
serially connected modulators - 357 mH
Below I present the results of two measurements of the TEG operation in different modes. With a higher supply voltage, the modulation frequency is higher. In both cases, the modulators are connected in series.

Input: 15V x 0.55A = 8.25W
Output: 1.88V x 123mA = 0.231W
Efficiency: 2.8%

Input: 19.4V x 0.81A = 15.714W
Output: 3.35V x 176mA = 0.59W
Efficiency: 3.75%
Findings:
The first and the saddest. After making changes to the modulator, an increase in consumption was recorded when working with a new converter. In the second case, the consumption increased by about 30 mA. Those. without load, the consumption was 0.78 A, with a load - 0.81 A. We multiply by the supply 19.4 V and we get 0.582 W - the same power that was removed from the output. However, I will repeat with all responsibility that this has not been observed before. When the load is connected, in this case, a steeper increase in the current through the modulator is clearly seen, which is a consequence of a decrease in the modulator inductance. What this is connected with is not yet known.
And another fly in the ointment. I am afraid that in this configuration it will not be possible to obtain an efficiency of more than 5% due to the weak overlap of the magnetic field. In other words, by saturating the core, we weaken the field inside the collector coil only in the area where this very core passes. But the magnetic lines coming from the center of the magnet through the center of the coil do not overlap. Moreover, part of the magnetic lines "displaced" from the core when it is saturated also bypasses the latter from the inside of the ring. Those. in this way, only a small part of the PM magnetic flux is modulated. It is necessary to change the geometry of the entire system. Perhaps we should expect some increase in efficiency, using ring magnets from the speakers. The idea of modulators operating in resonance mode does not let go either. However, under conditions of core saturation and, accordingly, constantly changing inductance of modulators, this is not easy to do.
Research continues...
If you want to discuss, go to the "passionate forum" - my nickname Armer.
Or write to [email protected], but I think it's better in the forum.

x x x
Dragons' Lord: First, many thanks to Armer for providing a report on the experiments with great illustrations. I think that soon we will see new works by Vladislav. In the meantime, I will express my thoughts on this project and its possible ways of improvement. I propose to change the generator circuit as follows:

Instead of flat external magnets (plates), it is proposed to use ring magnets. Moreover, the inner diameter of the magnet should be approximately equal to the same diameter of the magnetic circuit ring, and the outer diameter of the magnet is greater than the outer diameter of the magnetic circuit ring.
What is the problem with low efficiency? The problem is that the magnetic lines forced out of the magnetic circuit still cross the area of the turns of the secondary winding (they are squeezed out and concentrated in the central region). The specified ratio of the rings creates asymmetry and forces most of the magnetic lines, with the central magnetic circuit saturated to the limit, to go around it in the OUTER space. In the inner region, there will be fewer magnetic lines than in the base case. In fact, this "disease" cannot be completely cured by still using the rings. How to increase the overall efficiency is described below.
It is also proposed to use an additional external magnetic circuit, which concentrates the power
lines in the working area of the device, making it more powerful (here it is important not to overdo it, because we use the idea of fully saturating the central core). Structurally, the external magnetic circuit is a turned ferromagnetic parts of axisymmetric geometry (something like a pipe with flanges). You can see the horizontal line of the connector of the upper and lower "cups" in the picture. Or, it can be discrete independent magnetic circuits (brackets).
Further, it is worth thinking about improving the process from an “electrical” point of view. Clearly, the first thing to do is to swing the primary circuit into resonance. After all, we have no harmful feedback from the secondary circuit. It is proposed to use the CURRENT resonance for obvious reasons (after all, the goal is to saturate the core). The second remark, perhaps, is not so obvious at first glance. It is proposed to use as a secondary winding not the standard solenoid winding of the coil, but to make several flat bifilar Tesla coils and place them on the outer diameter of the magnetic circuit in a “puff pastry”, connecting them in series. In order to generally remove the existing minimal interaction with each other in the axial direction of adjacent bifilar coils, you need to connect them also THROUGH ONE, returning from the last to the second (reusing the meaning of the bifilar).
Thus, due to the maximum potential difference in two adjacent turns, the stored energy of the secondary circuit will be the maximum possible, which is an order of magnitude greater than the variant with a conventional solenoid.
As can be seen from the diagram, in view of the fact that the “pie” of bifilars has a fairly decent length in
horizontal direction - it is proposed to wind the primary not on top of the secondary, but under it. Directly to the magnetic circuit.
As I said, using rings, it is impossible to overcome a certain efficiency limit. And I assure you that there is no smell of super-unity there. The magnetic lines forced out of the central magnetic circuit will
go around it along the surface itself (along the shortest path), thereby, still crossing the area,
limited by turns of the secondary. Design analysis forces us to abandon the current circuitry. You need a central magnetic circuit WITHOUT a hole. Let's take a look at the following diagram:

The main magnetic circuit is assembled from separate plates or rods of rectangular section, and
is a parallelepiped. The primary is placed directly on it. Its axis is horizontal
and looks at us according to the scheme. Secondary, still a "puff pastry" of Tesla bifilars. Now
note that we have introduced an additional (secondary) magnetic circuit, which is a "cup" with
holes in their bottoms. The gap between the edge of the hole and the main central magnetic circuit (primary coil) should be minimal in order to effectively intercept the displaced magnetic lines and pull them towards itself, preventing them from passing through the bifilars. Of course, it should be noted that the magnetic permeability of the central magnetic circuit should be an order of magnitude higher than
auxiliary. For example: the central parallelepiped - 10000, "cups" - 1000. In the normal (not saturated) state, the central core, due to its greater magnetic permeability, will draw magnetic lines into itself.
And now the most interesting 😉 . Let's take a closer look - what did we get? ... And we got the most ordinary MEG, only in the "unfinished" version. In other words, I want to say that the classic
the execution of the MEG v.4.0 generator is a couple of times ahead of our best scheme, in view of its ability to redistribute magnetic lines (swinging “swings”) to remove useful energy throughout the entire cycle of its operation.
Moreover, from both arms of the magnetic circuit. In our case, we have a one-arm design. We simply do not use half of the possible efficiency.
I express the hope that Vladislav will conduct experiments on MEG v.4.0 in the very near future,
moreover, that such a machine (performed by v.3.0) he already has;). And of course, you must
use the resonance of the current on the primary control coils, installed not directly on the shoulders of the magnetic circuit, but on ferrite inserts-plates, perpendicular to that (into the gap of the magnetic circuit). The report, upon receipt to me, I will immediately make up and provide to our readers.

"Novosibirsk TEG Generator"

In this article, you will learn how to use the energy of the magnetic current in household appliances of your own production. In the article you will find detailed descriptions and assembly diagrams of simple devices based on the interaction of magnets and an induction coil, created by yourself.

Using energy in a familiar way is easy. It is enough to pour fuel into the tank or turn on the device in the electrical network. At the same time, such methods, as a rule, are the most expensive and have serious consequences for nature - colossal natural resources are spent on the production and operation of mechanisms.

In order to get working household appliances, you don’t always need an impressive 220 volts or a loud and bulky internal combustion engine. We will explore the possibility of creating simple but useful devices with unlimited potential.

Technologies for the use of modern powerful magnets are reluctantly developed - the oil producing and processing industries are at risk of being out of work. The future of all drives and activators lies with magnets, the effectiveness of which can be seen by assembling simple devices based on them with your own hands.

Visual video of the action of magnets

Fan with magnetic motor

Video how to assemble a magnetic fan

Magnetic fan generator

Generator from a cooler and magnets - video instruction

The properties of neodymium are extremely interesting - its light weight and powerful energy give an effect that is noticeable even on crafts (experimental devices) of a household level. The movement becomes possible due to the efficient design of the bearing turret of coolers and drives - the friction force is minimal. The ratio of mass and energy of neodymium provides ease of movement, which gives a wide field for experiments at home.

Free energy on video - magnetic motor

The field of application of magnetic fans is due to their autonomy. First of all, these are vehicles, trains, gatehouses, remote parking lots. Another indisputable advantage - noiselessness - makes it convenient in the house. You can install such a device as an auxiliary in a natural ventilation system (for example, in a bathroom). Any place where a constant small airflow is needed is suitable for this fan.

Flashlight with "eternal" recharging

This miniature device will be useful not only in an "emergency" case, but also for those who are engaged in the prevention of engineering networks, inspecting premises or returning home late from work. The design of the flashlight is primitive, but original - even a schoolboy can handle its assembly. However, it has its own induction generator.

1 - diode bridge; 2 - coil; 3 - magnet; 4 - batteries 3x1.2 V; 5 - switch; 6 - LEDs

For work you will need:

Thick marker (body).
Copper wire Ø 0.15-0.2 mm - about 25 m (can be taken from an old coil).
The light element is LEDs (ideally, the head is from a regular flashlight).
Batteries standard 4A, capacity 250 mA / h (from the battery "Krona") - 3 pcs.
Rectifier diodes type 1H4007 (1H4148) - 4 pcs.
Toggle switch or button.
Copper wire Ø 1 mm, small magnet (preferably neodymium).
Glue gun, soldering iron.

Working process:

1. Disassemble the marker, remove the contents, cut off the rod holder (there should be a plastic tube).

2. Install the flashlight head (illuminating element) into the removable flask cover.

3. Solder the diodes according to the scheme.

4. Group the batteries adjacently so that they can be placed in the body of the marker (flashlight body). Connect the batteries in series, on the spike.

5. Mark a section of the case so that you can see the free space not occupied by batteries. An induction coil and a magnetic generator will be arranged here.

6. Winding the coil. This operation must be carried out in accordance with the following rules:

Breaking the wire is not allowed. If it breaks, rewind the coil again.
The winding should start and end in the same place, do not break the wire in the middle after reaching the required number of turns (500 for a ferromagnet and 350 for neodymium).
The quality of the winding is not critical, but only in this case. The main requirements are the number of turns and uniform distribution over the body.
You can fix the coil on the body with ordinary tape.

7. To check the operation of the magnetic generator, you need to solder the ends of the coil - one to the lamp body, the second - to the output of the LEDs (use soldering acid). Then place the magnets in the case and shake a few times. If the lamps are working and everything is done correctly, the LEDs will respond to electromagnetic fluctuations with weak flashes. These oscillations will subsequently be rectified by a diode bridge and converted into direct current, which will be stored by the batteries.

8. Install the magnets in the generator compartment and cover it with hot glue or sealant (so that the magnets do not stick to the batteries).

10. Install all parts in the body and make coil protection (adhesive tape, casing or heat shrink tape).

Video how to make an eternal flashlight

Such a flashlight will be recharged if it is shaken - the magnets must walk along the coil to generate impulses. Neodymium magnets can be found in a DVD, CD drive, or computer hard drive. They are also available for sale - a suitable version of NdFeB N33 D4x2 mm costs about 2-3 rubles. (0.02-0.03 c.u.). The remaining parts, if they are not available, will cost no more than 60 rubles. (1 c.u.).

There are special generators for the implementation of magnetic energy, but they have not received wide distribution due to the powerful influence of the oil and processing industries. However, devices based on electromagnetic induction break through to the market with difficulty, and highly efficient induction furnaces and even heating boilers can be purchased on the free market. The technology is also widely used in electric vehicles, wind generators and magnetic motors.

Categories

Popular